e-drug
[Top] [All Lists]

[e-drug] Unethical blood substitute trials

E-DRUG: Unethical blood substitute trials
-----------------------------------

Please help stop unethical blood substitute trials in 8 countries by writing to 
the health ministers

Despite evidence from earlier trials of increased deaths and heart attacks with 
these products, trials are currently being conducted in the UK, Sweden, 
Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Poland, Belgium, Greece and South Africa. 
 
Our meta-analysis in the JAMA several weeks ago documenting this can be found 
at:   
 
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/299.19.jrv80007
        
ABSTRACT
CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Cell-Free Hemoglobin-Based Blood Substitutes and Risk of Myocardial Infarction 
and Death

A Meta-analysis

Charles Natanson, MD; Steven J. Kern, BS; Peter Lurie, MD, MPH; Steven M. 
Banks, PhD{dagger}; Sidney M. Wolfe, MD

JAMA. 2008;299(19):2304-2312. Published online April 28, 2008 
(doi:10.1001/jama.299.19.jrv80007).

Context  Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) are infusible 
oxygen-carrying liquids that have long shelf lives, have no need for 
refrigeration or cross-matching, and are ideal for treating hemorrhagic shock 
in remote settings. Some trials of HBBSs during the last decade have reported 
increased risks without clinical benefit.

Objective  To assess the safety of HBBSs in surgical, stroke, and trauma 
patients.

Data Sources  PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches for articles using 
hemoglobin and blood substitutes from 1980 through March 25, 2008; reviews of 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting materials; and 
Internet searches for company press releases.

Study Selection  Randomized controlled trials including patients aged 19 years 
and older receiving HBBSs therapeutically. The database searches yielded 70 
trials of which 13 met these criteria; in addition, data from 2 other trials 
were reported in 2 press releases, and additional data were included in 1 
relevant FDA review.

Data Extraction  Data on death and myocardial infarction (MI) as outcome 
variables.

Results  Sixteen trials involving 5 different products and 3711 patients in 
varied patient populations were identified. A test for heterogeneity of the 
results of these trials was not significant for either mortality or MI (for 
both, I2 = 0%, P ≥ .60), and data were combined using a fixed-effects 
model. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of 
death (164 deaths in the HBBS-treated groups and 123 deaths in the control 
groups; relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.61) and 
risk of MI (59 MIs in the HBBS-treated groups and 16 MIs in the control groups; 
RR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40) with these HBBSs. Subgroup analysis of these 
trials indicated the increased risk was not restricted to a particular HBBS or 
clinical indication.

Conclusion  Based on the available data, use of HBBSs is associated with a 
significantly increased risk of death and MI.
 
Copies of our letters to the eight health ministers urging that they halt the 
trials can be found at:
 
http://www.citizen.org/publications/release.cfm?ID=7583 
 
Please send copies to me of letters you send urging these trials be stopped. 
 
Please also send copies of your letters to interested press in your countries.
 
Thanks
 
Sidney M.Wolfe M.D.
Director, Health Research Group of Public Citizen
1600 20th St. NW, Washington, DC. 20009
202 588-7735  fax 588-7796
e-mail swolfe@citizen.org
Web sites: www.citizen.org/hrg
www.worstpills.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [e-drug] Unethical blood substitute trials, Sidney Wolfe <=